Instead, it reveals that blockchains, too, include social in addition to technical agreement. The airdrop Sybil aggressor, after all, didn’t break any apparent public law; she or he simply abused an open system so severely that other users needed to act to protect it. For some, this reaction will be viewed as a benefit and even an evolutionary course– a considerable action, in specific, towards decentralized self-governing companies (DAOs) that have genuine enforcement power and want to bend it.
